I get to meet with Texas business owners trying to decide if they should grow or sell their business. The answer generally lies in knowing how to value the business and deciding if that's sufficient for future plans or not.
If growth through franchising appears to be attractive, we then get to work preparing the business for it. This involves defining and documenting their proven and successful business model. We also represent the most successful franchise operations, so in time we are able to bring qualified operators to the business and the operation grows territory by territory.
It would seem to be a simple thing, just follow the proven plan and success will be yours. This should be a KISS, Keep It Simple Stupid, approach to making money; however, life proves success is never that simple. The danger in a franchise strategy for growing a company is the potential for an adverse relationship to develop between the franchisor and the franchisees. Here is how it can happen.
A franchisee's operation is struggling and the franchisor recognizes that they are trying to operate outside the proven plan. Warnings about this issue are repeatedly given; however, the operating problems persist and eventually the new franchisee begins to attribute the problems to the franchisor's inability to help them. The two sides continue to blame each other creating a vicious cycle of further bad business. What we have is an example of a sound system being destroyed as a result of the fundamental attribute error.
This everyday error occurs whenever we think an action is being caused by the actor instead of the stage. In traffic a car suddenly cuts in front of us. Our reaction is to think that happened because there is a bad (or rude) driver in front, when in fact that driver could be skilled and polite and narrowly averted an accident by quickly changing lanes to clear a road hazard. As long as all the driving incidents are the cause of other bad drivers, better driving skills that anticipate road hazards are never developed. Instead, we develop road rage.
Blaming problems on fundamental personal attributes of either the franchisor or franchisee is not a simple answer, it's a simplistic answer. Oliver Wendell Holmes said "I would not give a fig for the simplicity this side of complexity, but I would give my life for the simplicity on the other side of complexity." It is the difficult responsibility of both sides to go one step deeper into the situation and ask "Why is the proven method being altered?" What if the issue is not personal character but is the situation? It means a willingness to suspend judgment and get deeper into the complexities of the specific situation and how the model applies to it. Only after passing through this complexity it is reasonable to get back to keeping it simple.
In our process of guiding Active Investors into purchasing a new franchise, we have them contact other franchise owners to learn about their experiences. The alert Active Investor is going to ask how they handle difficulties that might make them question the plan. Is there any evidence of franchise rage?
If you are considering franchises, you want a successful system; but you also want a happy family.
Photo credit: star5112
There should be no better investment than one you make in yourself. You are the Active Investment as well as the Active Investor. This blog is about what happens "inside" when you invest in yourself by having your own business. Sometimes it's fulfilling and sometimes it's frustrating. These postings are meant to be companions for the journey.
Showing posts with label Salesmanship. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Salesmanship. Show all posts
Sunday, August 22, 2010
Monday, February 15, 2010
When Giving-up is a good thing
Over the past year this blog has evolved to become the application of methods that are Repetitive, Powerful, and Gentle to the practice of making money. Simplistic approaches to business issues frequently pass the the Repetitive and Powerful tests; however, truly effective practices must also qualify as Gentle and here is where many, like traditional selling, fail.
The largest consumer of motivational materials and methods is the US Sales and Marketing industry. Care to guess who might be number 2? It's the US military. This leads us to wonder, what is it about our traditional approaches to sales that is like the military? Do Sales Departments require a constant infusion of outside motivation because, like the military, they are organizations built around the acquisition and application of force? For those in sales that are drained by its continual churn, or those being pursued by smiling, manipulative salespeople, it seems the answer seems to be YES.
Poor observers of successful salespeople have concluded that they are master of Persuasion. This isn't really the case; however, it's a business myth that is relentlessly taught. Persuasion is verbal manipulation and not at all what we feel comfortable in calling gentle. This is the connection to motivational methods. When I hear a sales professional using them, I have to leave (at least mentally, if I can't physically).
More accurate observers of successful salespeople have started to realize that they have a talent in Qualification, rather than Persuasion. They have a heart for who really needs their products and services (it's never everyone!); and a sensitivity in understanding their prospects enough to know if there is a basis to beginning a sales process. It's time consuming and complex enough to work with someone qualified to be a customer (that is, they actually need, understand, and can afford the product). The efforts spent "selling" someone not obviously qualified is counter-productive.
Working with sales prospects is no different than traders working with options or gamblers with their games. Over and over again studies in these two areas have shown most traders and gamblers win about the same. The successful ones are those that lose the least. They continually qualify their positions and when it doesn't look like a win, they accept a small loss and simply leave. If a sales prospect doesn't qualify, the successful salesperson leaves them alone. The motivated loser keeps on.
Giving up trying to serve is completely different from giving up trying to sell. The highest use of our lives comes from service and we often can serve those who do not qualify as clients by helping them solve their problems in other ways. This can be anything from a simple expression of empathy to a referral to one of your strategic partners. If your intention is to always finish strong, a way to do that will always appear.
Photo credit: bk2204
The largest consumer of motivational materials and methods is the US Sales and Marketing industry. Care to guess who might be number 2? It's the US military. This leads us to wonder, what is it about our traditional approaches to sales that is like the military? Do Sales Departments require a constant infusion of outside motivation because, like the military, they are organizations built around the acquisition and application of force? For those in sales that are drained by its continual churn, or those being pursued by smiling, manipulative salespeople, it seems the answer seems to be YES.
Poor observers of successful salespeople have concluded that they are master of Persuasion. This isn't really the case; however, it's a business myth that is relentlessly taught. Persuasion is verbal manipulation and not at all what we feel comfortable in calling gentle. This is the connection to motivational methods. When I hear a sales professional using them, I have to leave (at least mentally, if I can't physically).
More accurate observers of successful salespeople have started to realize that they have a talent in Qualification, rather than Persuasion. They have a heart for who really needs their products and services (it's never everyone!); and a sensitivity in understanding their prospects enough to know if there is a basis to beginning a sales process. It's time consuming and complex enough to work with someone qualified to be a customer (that is, they actually need, understand, and can afford the product). The efforts spent "selling" someone not obviously qualified is counter-productive.
Working with sales prospects is no different than traders working with options or gamblers with their games. Over and over again studies in these two areas have shown most traders and gamblers win about the same. The successful ones are those that lose the least. They continually qualify their positions and when it doesn't look like a win, they accept a small loss and simply leave. If a sales prospect doesn't qualify, the successful salesperson leaves them alone. The motivated loser keeps on.
Giving up trying to serve is completely different from giving up trying to sell. The highest use of our lives comes from service and we often can serve those who do not qualify as clients by helping them solve their problems in other ways. This can be anything from a simple expression of empathy to a referral to one of your strategic partners. If your intention is to always finish strong, a way to do that will always appear.
Photo credit: bk2204
Labels:
Business,
marketing,
Marketing and Advertising,
Money,
referrals,
Salesmanship
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)