If growth through franchising appears to be attractive, we then get to work preparing the business for it. This involves defining and documenting their proven and successful business model. We also represent the most successful franchise operations, so in time we are able to bring qualified operators to the business and the operation grows territory by territory.
It would seem to be a simple thing, just follow the proven plan and success will be yours. This should be a KISS, Keep It Simple Stupid, approach to making money; however, life proves success is never that simple. The danger in a franchise strategy for growing a company is the potential for an adverse relationship to develop between the franchisor and the franchisees. Here is how it can happen.
A franchisee's operation is struggling and the franchisor recognizes that they are trying to operate outside the proven plan. Warnings about this issue are repeatedly given; however, the operating problems persist and eventually the new franchisee begins to attribute the problems to the franchisor's inability to help them. The two sides continue to blame each other creating a vicious cycle of further bad business. What we have is an example of a sound system being destroyed as a result of the fundamental attribute error.
This everyday error occurs whenever we think an action is being caused by the actor instead of the stage. In traffic a car suddenly cuts in front of us. Our reaction is to think that happened because there is a bad (or rude) driver in front, when in fact that driver could be skilled and polite and narrowly averted an accident by quickly changing lanes to clear a road hazard. As long as all the driving incidents are the cause of other bad drivers, better driving skills that anticipate road hazards are never developed. Instead, we develop road rage.
Blaming problems on fundamental personal attributes of either the franchisor or franchisee is not a simple answer, it's a simplistic answer. Oliver Wendell Holmes said "I would not give a fig for the simplicity this side of complexity, but I would give my life for the simplicity on the other side of complexity." It is the difficult responsibility of both sides to go one step deeper into the situation and ask "Why is the proven method being altered?" What if the issue is not personal character but is the situation? It means a willingness to suspend judgment and get deeper into the complexities of the specific situation and how the model applies to it. Only after passing through this complexity it is reasonable to get back to keeping it simple.
In our process of guiding Active Investors into purchasing a new franchise, we have them contact other franchise owners to learn about their experiences. The alert Active Investor is going to ask how they handle difficulties that might make them question the plan. Is there any evidence of franchise rage?
If you are considering franchises, you want a successful system; but you also want a happy family.
Photo credit: star5112
